Tetrabiblos Zodiac Code of Ptolemy

Truth or grift? This video will expose the real motives behind popular channels and challenge everything you thought you knew.

Let's get that audio check done. No, Greg, Don has not been putting makeup on me. That's a good one! I just need a couple of people to tell me the audio is good. Rough around the edges, rough around the edges. I've never been so happy to see ads. I didn't know you could see it; oh, I guess at the beginning of my videos because I disabled the mid-rolls. Good! All right, that's enough people, thank you.

Tokyo in the house! Awesome! Yeah, it's finally raining. Foreign Smith came from Paul Cook, huh? I've been following Paul Cook since he went to Egypt. I used to follow him when he was doing some Malta stuff and some UK stuff. As a matter of fact, Martin and I had talked about Paul Cook. I was thinking about putting him on my channel to talk to him, and then he got wrapped up in some stuff—man, personal business. He kind of put some links to some private stuff on his channel, and it got him in a little trouble. I just kind of backed off, man, but that doesn’t mean his material is not good. It doesn’t mean he’s not boots on the ground because he is. So, you know what? Whatever happens, it happens. I like Paul.

Good! I'm glad the audio is good. Karen Lewis says, "Who's going to San Diego to meet up?" I am! Please say hi if you see me. All right, Karen Lewis, let me tell you about this meetup, though. You guys already know Maurice, my brother. Good to see you again.

October 21st is the meetup. We're going to be there for about 10 hours. We have this old theater already acquired; it is directly across the street from my publisher's bookstore, the Book Tree. Now, you guys already know Max Egan is going to be there, Logan of Decode Your Reality is going to be there, and Danny of Removing the Shackles representing the Unfuckers group—she's going to be there. I told you about Take Shaman; you guys know Joel calls him "Perceiver" on YouTube. He’s going to be there, too. Martin Leakey from Flat Earth British—you already knew he was going to be there. And guess who he's bringing? He's bringing Auto Didactic! That's right, all the way from Australia, Campbell is going to be at the Archaics meetup on the 21st.

We’ve got about 60 tickets left to sell, and that’s it. We can’t oversell because the venue will only take 300 people. We had over 350 people at our first meetup, but it was a bigger venue. This is not a real big venue; it’ll comfortably sit 300 people. So, those of you wanting tickets, you better get to it!

We also have Archaics merchandise that has never been sold on the channel—lots of custom stuff. Yes, we have some girls that are making a lot of custom Archaics stuff, all these bling hats, vests, and overshirts. This is all girl stuff for you guys. We’ve got some new shirts coming out and new hats that are not like the other ones. Oh, these are nice too, but for the girls, yeah, we got some pretty interesting stuff. You guys know Robin; I brought her on the first meetup. Robin does this for a living; she does the craft shows and is very successful at what she does. But now she’s doing Archaics merchandise—all homemade. It’s awesome!

Now, we have a real serious video to put out. This video is going to determine the future of many channels on YouTube, I promise you that. Because this video right here is going to break it down, yeah, as to whether somebody is trying to reveal the truth, trying to be about the truth, trying to be altruistic to the human family, or if they’re just a grifter trying to make money and they don’t give a damn what the truth is as long as you sub and like all their presentations.

Here’s going to get down, as we say it; it’s going to get down to the nut cutting. This is the first video in a series that I’m doing, which is basically showing just how fraudulent the models are that are being perpetuated across the publishing world and now the social media world. Now that you know, since the internet has taken the storm in the last, what, 25 years? So, we’re going to go deep into this video, and just like my other deep presentations, I will be providing a free PDF download because you’re not going to believe what you hear.

I’m not a sensationalist, guys; when I make claims, I back them up. This video is going to blow your mind about the Zodiac.

=> 00:05:41

Don't let the grifters distract you; seek the truth and share it boldly.

In today's digital landscape, there are many grifters trying to make money, and they often don't care about the truth as long as you sub and like their content. This presentation is going to get down to the nut cutting, as I embark on the first video in a series that aims to expose just how fraudulent the models are that are being perpetuated across the publishing world and now the social media world. The internet has taken the storm in the last 25 years, and we will delve deep into this topic.

As with my other deep presentations, I will be providing a free PDF download because you are not going to believe what you hear. I am not a sensationalist; when I make claims, I back them up. This video is going to blow your mind about the Zodiac, its origin, and just how old it is. It is astonishing how unknown the Zodiac was to the entire world until it mysteriously appeared alongside a whole new paradigm-shattering belief system. These ideas were written and appeared at the same time and by the same people, and we will explore that in this video.

The free PDF download will be available about five to six minutes after this video concludes—just long enough for me to upload it to Podia and then provide you with a link in the description box and in the pinned comment. I suggest you take the PDF I provide in this video and share it because other people are not going to believe it unless they see it. You need to send this to people like Graham Hancock and everyone else who has interviewed him because it’s going to shut them up. There’s no way around these arguments; I am willing to debate anybody in the world about this output. You can't get around it, you can't squeeze through it, and you can't reinterpret it. I will not leave loopholes; you guys know that.

Now, let's get down to the nitty-gritty because this is some amazing material. Hello to everyone in the chat, including Euthanasia, Shiva Shampoo, and Mr. C. I see some familiar names like Merrell, Gigi, and Pamela Swann. Thank you, guys; I have some awesome moderators, including Johara and Lee. Dawn is not here right now, and I don't know when she’s going to pop up.

After we got back from the New Mexico trip, Dawn actually flew back with Maurice to Texas, while I took a detour to Colorado. I won’t go into the details because I don’t want to demonize anyone, but I received an email offering me 760 American antiquarian magazines. You guys know I’m going to share that with my community, and I definitely plan to create a bunch of videos from these magazines. However, the email should have been more specific; it only mentioned that if I was willing to make the drive, they had these magazines available.

I was very surprised after making a six-hour detour, which took 12 hours of travel time away from me, to find out that they were going to put an $8,750 price tag on these five boxes of magazines. I was also misled because the email stated that the majority were from the 1800s, with some from the early 1900s, but that was not what I found. There was only one box with some from the 1800s, and it wasn’t very many; all the other boxes were from the 1900s.

I realize now that this is on me; I should have emailed this person and asked them to be more detail-specific before I had my team drive with me for six hours, only to discover that all of this was BS. I even pulled out $1,000 cash just to buy the magazines I wanted, but there were other complications. Someone else was involved, and I won’t name them or tell you what town it was in because it’s not important. I learned a very valuable lesson: before I just show up in places, I need to get all the details right first. I don’t mind staying on the road a little longer; I read books, work on video clips, and edit videos, but I’m not the one driving. Other passengers can get frustrated, and it’s a long time to drive. So, while I did lose out a little bit, I give out bonuses, and I was the one who...

=> 00:09:52

Always get the details right before diving in; lessons learned turn into content gold.

All this was BS, and yeah, I was not well with it. I even pulled out a thousand cash just to buy the magazines that I wanted. However, there was some other stuff going on, and somebody else was involved. You know what? I'm not going to name them, and I'm not even going to tell you what town it was; it's not even important. I learned a very valuable lesson: before I just show up in places, I'm going to get all the details right first. Because all that right there, I don't care about staying on the road a little extra longer. I read books, I work on video clips, and I edit videos, but I'm not the one driving. Other passengers, you know, they get frustrated; it's a long time to drive.

So, I did lose out a little bit. I give out bonuses, and I was one of those American antiquarian magazine enthusiasts, but it's okay. It's a lesson learned, and I'm back in time. It didn't stop me from releasing videos during that whole trip; I still released a video every other day and two videos on our KXTV. I'm talking about my own videos and other ones I'll upload. So, the whole trip was good. I got a Pecos conspiracy video out of it that I didn't even plan on doing. Martin and I just couldn't stop seeing what we were seeing; it was all fake. The whole National Monument, supposedly built 400 years ago, is not true.

You guys remember, stonework was my thing. Paradise Rock Gardens—you used to look up my website and see all the work that I did as a contractor: paradiserockgardens.com. I'm a stone guy; I know my geopolymers. I know what works and what stones work. Man, I'm really good at Flagstone Pavers, but what I was seeing was a really shoddy job. It was terrible, but that's okay.

Now, for those who don't know, Central Tetrabellos—Tetra is Greek, meaning four, and biblos means books. It's very important to realize that this is not going to go where you think it's going to go, guys. I was taken aback by the wealth of information that I suddenly came across when I started doing a deep dive on the Zodiac. I've done a Zodiac video in the past and a tarot video explaining the origins, but I didn't have this wealth of information. It's amazing—absolutely amazing. Thank you, Corey; thank you, Meryl; JJ Recon, always love, brother. And keep it clean—Greg G's telling y'all to keep it clean, which means somebody's not doing that.

You guys know what? It's a hallmark of my channel: I do not entertain negativity. I don't care if you argue with me or disagree with me, but you're not going to come on my channel and condescendingly try to educate me as to why I'm wrong and you're right. Most of the people that do that only watched one video to get triggered and have no idea about the wealth of data that I've presented in 539 other videos. I don't tolerate that at all, and I especially delete and block anybody I see attacking someone else. There’s going to be no bullying in my chat at all whatsoever. Say what you want to say, but be very careful how you say it. I block people on a daily basis, and despite the over a thousand to fifteen hundred people that have been blocked off this channel, it is still growing exponentially every day. So, I'm going to take that as evidence that I'm doing the right thing. I'm not entertaining any negativity—don't bring it to my channel.

Alright, let's see. Thank you, Michelle. Oh, we got a long video! This video might be a little long, guys, because we have to get to the nuts and bolts. I'm telling you, this is one of the few times in my life that I was really surprised. I was not expecting at all to find what I'm about to reveal to you about the Zodiac. I was expecting it to be controversial; I vaguely knew this.

This PDF is probably going to be my most downloaded, most popular PDF. I know Graham Hancock's going to read it. I don't care what Greg Braden says; he knows he's heard of archaics and Jason of Archaics. He lied. I know he lied to Joe. I have too many people who have been sending them emails—his people emails. So, I am very well aware because I know people who know Graham Hancock. He knows all about Jason and Archaics; he's being quiet. Why? Because he can. You know, he's not about telling the truth.

=> 00:14:13

The truth about the Zodiac is not what you think; it's time to uncover the hidden lies behind the facade.

There have been times in my life that I was really surprised. I was not expecting at all to find what I'm about to reveal to you about the Zodiac. I wasn't expecting to find this; I was expecting it to be controversial. I vaguely knew this, but, yeah, this PDF is probably going to be my most downloaded, most popular PDF. I know Graham Hancock's gonna read it. I don't care what Greg Braden says; he knows he's heard of archaics and Jason of archaics. He lied. I know he lied to Joe. I have too many people who have been sending them emails—his people, emails. So, equally, I am very well aware because I know people who know Graham Hancock. He knows all about Jason and archaics, but he's being quiet. Why? Because he can. You know, he's not about telling the truth.

Oh, and I'm about to expose more of that in this video here. It's amazing the depth of deceit that's going on in the publishing industry. It is all orchestrated. Remember, I said this by the end of this video: everything that is being promoted today on social media and in the publishing world and in print is all trying to do one thing—well, two things really. They are trying to hide the Phoenix and hide the vapor canopy. Everything's just the opposite, guys. Instead of a phoenix you're supposed to be looking for, they created a zodiac. Instead of a vapor canopy, we're supposed to remember they invented ice ages. It's amazing how deep this goes.

We’re going to get to it. Nanny boo boo, I know you know we lied. You can see it on his face when he was really surprised by John's question. Archaics is getting some good traction, guys. You know that I was advertised all over Alex Jones' channel for a while due to Greg Reese. Greg Reese had done a really good cyclical history post-shift video and featured some of my work on 2046 and in my book, cited my book Annunaki Homeworld.

Recently, Greg Reese and Logan of Decode Your Reality did a show, and again they discussed some of my work. That's pretty interesting. But just yesterday, I believe it was yesterday or the day before, Sam Tripoli and Greg Reese talked about my 2040 Phoenix research and 2046 research. Greg Reese went into some detail, plugged my website, and mentioned my name a couple of times in that interview. I've always liked Greg Reese; he's got the voice of somebody who's supposed to be doing these documentaries. He's good at this. He comes off to me as a guy who is genuinely interested in the truth.

Now, I also perceive him to be someone who is coming into contact with so much data that he's still having trouble eliminating the false paradigms, and that's what archaics is about. I'm about eliminating all this false crap, which is what we're going to do in this video. It's amazing, guys.

You know that Graham Hancock has asserted that the ancient Egyptians knew of the zodiac. He said that in multiple interviews and in his published books. He even stated that the ancient Egyptians had calculated the great cycle at 25,920 years. This is done by giving 30 degrees to each one of the 12 houses of the zodiac and then claiming that that 30 degrees takes 2,160 years for each age to pass, each age of the Sun. Then it's just simple arithmetic: 2,160 years per house times 12 houses is 25,920 years. It sounds real good; unfortunately, I'm going to have to tell you—and I'm going to show you in this video—that every bit of that was very recently made up.

Let me drink some coffee to that one because there's a whole lot of astrology channels out there and Tarot channels out there that are going to get pissed when they listen to this presentation, I promise you that.

All right, guys, Jamie Robbins, thank you, bro. Yeah, I'm back home, guys, because this is where I do my best videos—in the studio. I'm going to be doing something in my other studio as well, the small studio that you guys really became familiar with. Yeah, but it's crazy. So, anyway, guys, there's a lot of people who have...

=> 00:19:02

The idea that ancient civilizations understood a 25,920-year zodiac cycle is a modern myth, not rooted in historical evidence.

In this video, I am going to show you that every bit of that was very recently made up. Let me take a moment to drink some coffee to that one, because there are a whole lot of astrology and Tarot channels out there that are going to get upset when they listen to this presentation. I promise you that.

All right, guys, Jamie Robbins, thank you, bro. Yes, I'm back home because this is where I do my best videos—in the studio. I will also be doing something in my other studio, the small studio that you guys have really become familiar with. It's crazy, so let’s dive into the topic.

There are many people who have written about the 25,920-year cycle, referring to it as the zodiacal cycle or the great age. They claim that two destructions of the world occurred during this cycle, roughly around 12,000 years ago. You have probably seen this 12,000-year number mentioned quite a bit. Graham Hancock has added more details, such as stating that Atlantis was destroyed in 11,600 BC. He often tells you to just do the math; it’s simple. Solon told Plato that the Egyptians informed him that Atlantis was destroyed 9,000 years earlier from 600 BC, when Solon heard this.

However, I have several videos pointing out that all of this is anachronistic; it’s total BS. Every bit of it is BS, and it was known to be so by at least 40 different ancient and modern authors. I have cited them in a PDF download, similar to the one you will find in my last video ranting about the ridiculousness of Graham Hancock's theories.

Now, I want to emphasize that there is not a single reference in any ancient text to a 25,920-year cycle—not one. It is debatable, and what I mean by that is you are welcome to debate me, but you will not be able to find a single reference. This is a very new idea. The claim that the Egyptians knew of a zodiac is simply not true; Graham Hancock lied. The Egyptians did not know of a zodiac unless you reinterpret what an Egyptian is.

Let me explain. The Ptolemies were from Macedonia, which is in Northern Greece. The Ptolemies were Macedonian rulers of Egypt, ruling over 500 years after Egypt fell to Persia, Babylon, and Assyria. Egypt eventually fell to Macedonia, and then to Alexander the Great, and later to Rome. The very oldest zodiac known in the world, which is acknowledged across the board in academia, is found in Egypt at Dendera. This structure was specifically built by Greeks during the Roman era, around 75 to 100 BC.

Do you understand the problem here? For those of you who are not innate chronologists, the oldest depiction of a zodiac is only 2,100 years old. This is not only the oldest depiction, but apparently, it is the first. I will explain why. It was built during the Roman era by Greeks living in Egypt, not by Egyptians. The Egyptian civilization lasted 26 dynasties, and the first zodiac in Egypt appeared 500 years after the final Egyptian dynasty.

This is a significant problem for Graham Hancock, as the Egyptians knew of no zodiac. They also did not know of a 25,920-year cycle; both of these concepts are created inventions of Graham Hancock, published in his books and reiterated in documentaries and interviews.

Moreover, these statements, including the false claims about the 9,000 years of Plato, are misleading. He hides behind the fact that there was indeed a genuine mistake by Plato, who said it was 9,000 years. However, to promote that today, Graham Hancock has to ignore all the academics and scholars who, long before Jason was even born, had already corrected this to nine thousand moons. This correction places the Atlantis story in the context of the Sea Peoples’ Federation invasions of the Mediterranean in the 13th century BC.

All of this has already been proven, yet Graham Hancock ignores it because it is not convenient to the narrative he has been hired to promote. This presentation on the zodiac will collapse the entire Graham Hancock narrative and everyone who follows that BS.

=> 00:24:26

Graham Hancock's narrative crumbles under scrutiny; the truth about ancient history is often buried beneath convenient myths.

Thousand years of Plato is a topic that has sparked considerable debate. It is often stated that there was a genuine mistake by Plato, who claimed it was 9,000 years. However, to promote this idea today, Graham Hancock has to ignore all the academics and scholars who, long before Jason was even born, had already clarified that it wasn't 9,000 years. It was corrected in Plato's day to nine thousand moons, which aligns Atlantis's story with the Sea People's Federation invasions of the Mediterranean in the 13th century BC. All of this has already been proven, but Graham Hancock ignores it because it is not convenient to the narrative he has been hired to promote.

This presentation on the Zodiac will collapse the entire Graham Hancock narrative and challenge everyone who follows that BS. The issue goes much deeper than the fact that Graham Hancock got it wrong; the Egyptians never knew a zodiac, nor did they understand a 25,920-year cycle. Instead, he adopted a 12,000-year destruction cycle to fit his Ice Age theory, which is entirely invented. This is what we are going to explore further after I take a sip of coffee. I hope Don gets here pretty soon because that was the last cup in that pot. I always find that other people's coffee tastes better than the coffee you make for yourself.

Now, let's get to the main discussion. I don't even know how many people are in the chat, but we already have over 1,000 people out of 1,100. Can I encourage a hundred people to email Graham Hancock's team and tell them, "Hey man, this dude is really making you look bad"? It's about time to bring him to the table or give him a voice or debate him. I will tell you now, you can always quote me: Graham Hancock will never debate me. That's a promise. He has too much on the line, and in one debate, I will dismantle his whole life's work to BS.

Let's proceed. I have some really interesting material here. In my excursions into Egyptology, I was once fascinated by it. My first book, published in 2006, was titled Lost Scriptures of Giza, where I devoted two chapters to Egyptian theology. What is found in the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the coffin texts, the pyramid texts, and the wall texts in all the temples from Karnak throughout Egypt reveals something significant. However, this might hurt some of your feelings: there isn't a hint of the zodiac or any knowledge of the zodiacal signs in all of Egyptian history—nothing.

This leads us to ponder: who built the Zodiac of Dendera and why? Historical records tell us it was the Ptolemies, who were Greeks descended from Macedon and built it 500 years after Egypt fell. They constructed it during the height of Roman power, a time when many new things appeared in the world simultaneously.

I must mention my brother Martin Leakey and include Max Egan. Although Martin and I initiated the research and revelations, Max Egan took it to another level, finding proof after proof that we were right concerning the Great Wall of China. Contrary to popular belief, it was actually built, funded, and protected by Romans, not the Chinese. We have those videos, guys.

I am glad to see Marie Harris here. She used to be one of my critics, but she has come around. She says, "I followed Hancock for years; it was hard to hear that he was deliberately lying, but truth is truth, period." You're absolutely right, Marie; it's hard to hear. I loved Fingerprints of the Gods until 15 years later when I dissected it. My copy now looks like a Bible, with things color-coded and all kinds of references. You should see my notes; they are so well organized.

This is what you are going to be downloading, guys: none of this is a coffin sealed in lead; it is going to sink this whole zodiac narrative. It's all right here.

=> 00:29:00

The truth about ancient knowledge is often buried under layers of deception crafted by modern narratives.

Around because you used to be one of my critics, this is Marie Harris. She says, "I followed Hancock for years. It was hard to hear that he was deliberately lying, but truth is truth, period." You're absolutely right; it's hard to hear. I loved Fingerprints of the Gods until 15 years later when I dissected it. My copy now looks like a Bible; I got things color-coded, and I have all kinds of references. You open up my copy of that book, and thank you, she just brought me mine. She just brought me my notes; they are so well organized. I don't need them because I got them. I opened up another screen, but this is what you're going to be downloading, guys.

None of this—this is like a coffin sealed in lead—gonna sink this whole zodiac. It's all right here, and it's all free to you guys too because presentations are never as good as the real product. This is the research; everything you can look up for yourself. You'll be able to download this when this video is over with, but this is the business right here. It collapses almost the entire spectrum of narratives that are being promoted out there now.

So let's get to it. The Egyptian coffin texts, the pyramid texts, the wall texts, the entire collection of the ancient Egyptian Book of Life that was later retitled the Book of the Dead—nothing, not a hint of knowledge of the zodiac. Process that for a minute. Think about the level of deceit that has been promoted in Hollywood. Think about just how much of a connection in your mind has been created by Hollywood and the publishing industry. When you think of Egypt, you think of the ancient zodiac; when you think of the zodiac and see the symbols, you're automatically thinking ancient Egyptian. You think there's a correlate there; it's been specifically planted in your mind, although there isn't a trace of connection between ancient Egypt and any knowledge of the zodiac—nothing.

That's just the beginning. In all 26 Egyptian dynasties, nothing—not one funerary text, not one wall text, coffin, nothing. No evidence in the reliefs, the bas-relief, or the hieroglyphs. We see Egyptian astronomy and astrology, and it's very different—nothing like the zodiac.

So, the first zodiac appears in Egypt long after Egypt is gone, and it now belongs to Rome. That's the first appearance of the zodiac when Egypt was Roman, around 75 to 100 BC. Roman Egyptians descended from the Ptolemies, who were Greeks. These are Grecianized Romans from Northern Africa who built this zodiac. It's very interesting, guys; it's a very interesting topic.

This led me to believe—this really had me befuddled at first. I couldn't find—I spent days going through my library. I just couldn’t find it. I did this research last month, and I had to process it the whole time I was on a trip. I talked about it with the guys that were home again and the girls. We had conversations about this, and I openly had—you know, what it's just so unbelievable. I couldn't put this presentation together until I came back and after I had processed all this information because, like I said, girls, it goes far deeper.

Screw Egypt; if the zodiac is real, we should find evidence of it in Sumer, right? In the Sumerian text, Sumerian tradition, Sumerian belief, we should find some evidence of it. What about in academia? What about Babylonian? I know Babylonian astronomy; it's called the moolapin. Remember I've told you guys in past presentations? The Babylonians were aware of the Phoenix; it was called the pin deity. The moolapin was a study of the stars, but it concerned also the Phoenix.

Babylonians were fascinated with the moolapin. We have a version of the moolapin—the Sumerian version developed after the collapse of the vapor canopy after the great flood. In Babylonian texts, we do have a type of zodiac, but it's not like the one at Dendera; it has 18 constellations, not 12. It's very different, and the animals are different; the concepts are different. But the Babylonians were still fixated on the same things the Egyptians were fixated on, which were the movements of Venus, the dog star Sirius, and the Seven Sisters—and Orion. Almost every ancient civilization was...

=> 00:33:48

Ancient civilizations were obsessed with the stars, but surprisingly, none of them had a zodiac.

The pin deity, referred to as "p-i-n mule," was part of a broader study of the stars, which also concerned the Phoenix. The Babylonians were particularly fascinated with the moolapin. We possess a version of the mole happened, specifically the Sumerian version, which developed after the collapse of the vapor canopy following the great flood.

In Babylonian texts, we do find a type of zodiac; however, it differs significantly from the one at Dendera. The Babylonian zodiac comprises 18 constellations instead of the traditional 12. The animals and concepts represented are also quite different. Nevertheless, the Babylonians remained fixated on the same celestial bodies that captivated the Egyptians, such as the movements of Venus, the dog star Sirius, and the Seven Sisters, which are also known as the Pleiades. Almost every ancient civilization, including the Olmec, Zapotec, Cliche Imara, and the ancient ancestors of the Inca and Maya, focused on these celestial phenomena, particularly the Seven Sisters and the movements of Venus. They were keen observers of Sirius, Orion, and Arcturus, and they were very cognizant of the motion of the Moon.

However, it is notable that none of these ancient civilizations paid much attention to the Sun. This lack of focus on the Sun is why we do not find a zodiac in any of these civilizations. To elaborate, I have read the Epic of Gilgamesh, specifically Samuel Noah Kramer's translation, which impressed me so much that I sought out a different translation. I discovered a translator named Maureen Gallery Kovacs, whose work I greatly admire for its detail and insightful commentaries. Both Kramer's and Kovacs' translations of the Epic of Gilgamesh contain no mention of the zodiac.

Similarly, in the animal LS7 tablets of Babylonian creation, which is a Babylonian cosmological text, there is also no reference to the zodiac. This absence raises the question: how is it possible that there is no zodiac in these ancient texts? The oldest tablets, which contain stories paralleling some biblical narratives, such as the Car Sag tablets, also lack any mention of the zodiac. The same can be said for the Atra-Hasis Epic, the Adapa Epic, and the Era Epos; none of these widely disseminated and translated major epics of the ancient world include any reference to the zodiac or its signs. This absence presents a significant problem.

At this point, I took a moment to sip my coffee. Dawn had just entered the room; she was likely monitoring the chat. Unfortunately, she had to put her cat down. Her cat, Raven, was seven years old and had been diagnosed with cat leukemia. I was relieved that Raven held on until Dawn returned, as she would have been devastated if the cat had passed while we were away. I’m glad Dawn had three days to spend with Raven before gently putting her down.

As I continued, I acknowledged that I couldn't monitor the chat due to my busy schedule. My friends at Truth Mafia often refer to this as dropping "truth bombs," and that’s precisely what I aimed to do today.

Throughout the entire length of Egyptian civilization, from the Old Kingdom to the New Kingdom and beyond, there is no mention of a zodiac. This absence may also explain why the Sumerians, Babylonians, Academians, Assyrians, and Hittites did not have a zodiac either. This topic delves deep into the threads of deception that have been woven into the publishing industry, particularly by popular authors such as Andy Collins, Robert Schoch, Robert Marvel, and Graham Hancock. While I have read all their material, I am uncertain if all of it is misleading.

=> 00:38:31

The zodiac we know today is a modern construct, not rooted in ancient Egyptian or Near Eastern civilizations.

The discussion revolves around the entire length of the Egyptian civilization, including the Old Kingdom, Middle Kingdom, New Kingdom, and post-Kingdom periods. It is noted that there is nothing about a zodiac in these ancient cultures, which may explain why the Sumerians, Babylonians, Academians, Assyrians, and Hittites also did not have a zodiac.

This topic delves deep into the threads of deception that have been woven into the publishing industry, particularly among popular authors such as Andy Collins, Robert Schoch, Robert Marvel, and Graham Hancock. While the speaker acknowledges that they have read all of their material, they express uncertainty about whether all of it is misleading. However, they assert that these authors have borrowed into this material, which they deem to be total deception. The speaker emphasizes that their assertion may not fully resonate until the audience reaches the end of the presentation, where they will encounter an overwhelming amount of data about the non-existence of the zodiac.

The speaker continues by stating that extensive research into Egypt and the Near East will yield no zodiacal information. They mention that encyclopedias and textbooks claim that the Egyptians did know the Zodiac, citing the zodiac on the Temple of Dendera. However, they argue that deeper research reveals the deception, as the Temple of Dendera was constructed 75 to 100 BC, which is 500 years after the Egyptians were gone. This temple was built by Macedonian descended Greeks, specifically the Ptolemies, during the Roman period, indicating that the zodiac was not originally Egyptian.

To illustrate this point, the speaker provides an analogy: the Saracens and the Arabs took Jerusalem and built the Dome of the Rock there, but this does not mean that the people of Jerusalem are Muslim. They further emphasize the importance of historical accuracy by referencing the Great Wall of China, which they assert was a Roman project. They mention that Max Egan discovered old shipping docks and wharfs, revealing that hundreds of ships once docked at the end of the Great Wall to unload goods that were transported all the way to Rome, the Middle East, and the Caspian Sea.

The speaker highlights that the construction of the Great Wall began around 200 BC and was largely completed by 100 BC, coinciding with the construction of the Zodiac of Dendera. According to Chinese scholars, the zodiac was introduced into the Han Dynasty around 100 BC. The speaker notes that the Chinese zodiac, which features 12 signs that differ significantly from the Western zodiac, includes symbols like a dragon, snakes, a toad, and a turtle. However, they assert that the Chinese zodiac is not ancient, as Chinese scholars claim it originated during the Han Dynasty.

The speaker clarifies that they are not confusing the 12-house zodiac with the older lunar zodiac, which had 13 signs. They explain that many civilizations had a lunar zodiac, but it was not widely popular due to the moon's irregularity. Although some cultures attempted to maintain the lunar zodiac, it ultimately did not gain traction like the 12-partitioned solar zodiac. They even mention attempts to add a 13th sign to the solar zodiac called Ophiuchus.

=> 00:43:19

The truth about astrology's origins is often flipped; the West didn't borrow from the East, it created and exported knowledge instead.

The Dynasty around 100 BC is significant because it is the period during which the Romans were conducting business. However, it is important to clarify that I am not referring to the 12-house zodiac but rather to the older lunar zodiac, which actually featured 13 signs. Various civilizations had their own versions of a lunar zodiac, but it emerged concurrently with the solar zodiacs. The lunar zodiac was inherently different and did not gain widespread popularity, primarily because the moon does not conform to that system. Although some cultures attempted to maintain the lunar zodiac, it ultimately faded away in favor of the 12-partitioned solar zodiac.

Interestingly, there were attempts to incorporate a 13th sign into the solar zodiac, known as Ophiuchus, the snake. However, this effort also failed, and the system reverted back to 12 signs.

In a fascinating twist, China acknowledges that there was no zodiac in the ancient world until the Han Dynasty, which coincided with their contact with Rome. This revelation prompted me to delve into research on India. I gathered several books to explore what India has to say about the zodiac. The oldest Sanskrit text on astrology that we possess dates from 270 A.D., not BC, which is a significant distinction. This text is known as the Yavanajitaka.

The term "Yavan" is recognized as equivalent to "Javen" in the Old Testament and in the Book of Jasher, referring to the ancestral name for the Greeks. Therefore, the name of this Sanskrit text, Yavanajitaka, translates to "the sayings of the Greeks." According to Hindu scholars, this oldest Sanskrit text on astrology represents knowledge that was derived from the Greeks. Contrary to the narrative presented by many modern authors about the high antiquity of the Hindu system and how the West borrowed everything, my findings suggest otherwise. It appears that the West invented everything and subsequently exported this knowledge to other cultures, as supported by both Chinese and Indian perspectives.

Montucla noted that the Hindu zodiac was borrowed from the Greeks, a statement I did not fabricate but sourced from Montucla himself. It is crucial to recognize that we have been misled about the origins of these systems.

As early as 1000 BC, there existed a Sanskrit astronomical text, which is distinct from astrology. While the first astrological text in India, the Yavanajitaka, dates to 270 A.D., the oldest Sanskrit astronomical text, known as the Surya Siddhanta, dates back to 1000 BC. This ancient text is a comprehensive study of stars and astronomy, yet it contains no references to the zodiac whatsoever, which is quite surprising.

On a lighter note, I have encountered some challenges with a group of individuals known as the "crummies." Recently, one member of this group has been particularly hostile towards me, prompting me to inquire about his grievances. I learned that several individuals from his community had left to join my platform, Archaics, and ceased their financial support for him. Upon further investigation, I discovered that he charges between $800 to $900 for experiences that involve stargazing in a remote location in Kerrville, where he practices astrology. This led me to question why he harbors such animosity towards me.

=> 00:47:55

Don't let grifters dictate your journey; true wisdom comes from within, not from the stars.

In Sanskrit, there's nothing about the Zodiac in it. It's crazy, guys. So let me get to the crummies real quick. There's this guy—I don't know anything about him, but he's attacked me so vehemently over and over and over—and finally, I have to ask, “Hey man, who is this guy? What's his problem with me? I don't understand.” Several people that were in his community jumped ship and came to archaics; they no longer pay him. I found out that he charges about $800 to $900 and takes people to a place way out in Kerrville to watch the stars. He’s an astrologer. I said, “Oh, okay, one of those guys.”

So, what's his deal with me? Why is he so pissed off at me? He said, “Well, he says you stole the Phoenix from me.” You guys realize how stupid that sounds? An astrologer who is basically grifting people for a lot of money is mad at Jason of archaics because I stole the Phoenix from him? That's just moronic. The Phoenix has been around for about 35 centuries in the literature. In the version that I bring to the table, it is the most ancient. That Phoenix was a symbol for a cycle, not a bird.

Anyway, Robert Feast has now changed his name; I heard he's not going by Robert Phoenix anymore. I don't know what he's going by—he can go by Robert Fakery for all I care—because what he did offended me. Attacking me? I don't care; I've got trolls everywhere. But when I went to Asheville, I was taken in by the crummies, and they gave me a place to stay. I said, “You know what? I appreciate it. I have a hotel over here; thank you for taking my friends in. You didn't have to do that, but I'm going to go ahead and stay at the hotel I've already paid for.” They said, “Well, come on over anytime.”

So, I took them up on that. I said, “Hey, check it out. You guys live in a beautiful place; I love the atmosphere here.” I met Freeman Fry at their house and a lot of other YouTubers. I didn't know these people had been to India, lived with the yogis, and done all that. They are authors; I have their books. I'm reading one right now. They’ve written books independently and together, and everybody knows them as the crummies. They have a beautiful place in Asheville, North Carolina, and they were a part of Robert's group, doing weekly shows with him.

One day, I just said, “Hey, would you guys mind if I did a live show right here?” I did a live show in their sunroom, and they were there and participated. I turned the camera and let them talk. When Robert Phoenix found out that the crummies were on archaics—because you guys have seen them, many of you have seen them on my channel—two older people, beautiful souls. As soon as he found out, he dropped them like a bad habit. No more weekly shows with the crummies. To me, that's pedantic. You exposed your soul for what you really are: a grifter.

Yeah, man, if anybody sees Robert Phoenix out there, watch out because he's trying to dig in your wallet. I don't care what anybody says. Alright, yeah, Sherry lives—you can go and get that troll out of the chat. One of my moderators, go ahead and block that person, Sherry Ives. Get him out of my chat. You're not going to accuse the crummies of stealing information from others; I ain't trying to hear that. All you Robert Phoenix trolls, you're not going to make it here.

He's just one individual who has set his sights on me. It's ridiculous; it's very childish. Let's get through this presentation because by the time I'm done, any reasonably intelligent person will understand that the whole astrology Zodiac deal is a house of cards, and I will explain that in a minute. It has nothing to do with the system; everything always has to do with the individual. There are all kinds of different systems, but it takes a special soul to be a medium, a channeler, or someone who can define things. The system itself is unimportant, and when it comes to astrology and the Zodiac, it's not even old. So, we're going to get to that here.

Yeah, man, it's crazy. It's crazy, guys. Yo man, that dude Robert Phoenix owes me an apology. I'm never going to get it, but...

=> 00:51:53

Astrology is just a modern illusion; true understanding comes from within, not from the stars.

This presentation aims to clarify that by the time I'm done, any reasonably intelligent person will understand that the whole astrology Zodiac deal is a house of cards. I will explain that in a minute. It has nothing to do with the system; everything always has everything to do with the individual. There are all kinds of different systems, but it takes a special soul to be a medium, a channeler, or someone who can define things. The system itself is unimportant, and when it comes to astrology and the Zodiac, it's not even old. We will get to that here.

Now, moving on to a personal note, it's crazy, guys. Yo man, that dude Robert Phoenix owes me an apology. I'm never going to get it, but he owes me an apology, man. I'm dead serious. He has literally told people in his community that he wouldn't trust his kids around me and has made statements like that. He has pulled up my criminal history and tried to show it to anyone who would see it. In Robert Phoenix's world, 17-year-old kids can't make mistakes; you are eternally damned. So, I've got no patience for people like that. He is not welcome in my community, and already a bunch of people from his community have come to mine, and they are more than welcome here. Just leave that Robert Phoenix at the door.

Now, let's shift gears to a different topic. I found it really interesting while asking friends and sending emails to different people. I said, "Hey man, I can't get this wrong. I know you guys are more qualified to know this than me, but I have read the Bhagavad Gita. I've read all about Arjuna, and I remember reading about the Great War in the Mahabharata." I don't remember all the details, but when I was in prison, I studied these books. I was most fascinated not with the Bhagavad Gita or the Mahabharata, but with the Ramayana, because of the Babylonian crossover. I remember studying these in prison, and in retrospect, it dawned on me: there isn't an effing reference to the Zodiac in any of these three ancient Indian epics. For Graham Hancock, that's a problem. I was really shocked by that revelation.

Now, addressing Debbie Steele, you're welcome. I'm really speaking up for those he's hurt by kicking him out of his community and by talking about them behind their backs, all because they associate with me. I have thick skin; there is nothing that man or anybody can do to hurt me. I'm really speaking up on behalf of those that he has affected negatively and used me to do it. I ain't cool with that at all.

Lisa Lambert, you just told the truth. You mentioned that astrology is the same age as the Bible. The problem is, I don't know how old you think the Bible is, but I'm going to reveal it to you in this deal. Operation Road Pool, I need to make you aware that if you didn't fly off at the mouth so much, you know what I'm talking about, Road Pool. If you didn't fly off at the tongue so much, I'd give you a blue wrench for how long you've been in my community. But you are a loose cannon, bro.

Tim Cleary, we're not talking about the lunar Zodiac; we are talking about the Zodiac, which is a sun-based system. There are old lunar Zodiacs, but that's because the vapor canopy during that time allowed lunar systems to thrive. There were so many different kinds; there were all kinds of moon wheels that existed back then. I'm talking about the 12 houses of the solar Zodiac that we use today.

In fact, let's look at this right here. You guys are real familiar with it; I know you are. This is the Zodiac. This is what we're talking about. This is what we're told in modern publishing is very, very ancient: Taurus, Gemini, Aries, and all of this right here. Thank you, babe. All of this is what we're told is very, very ancient. This is the subject matter of this video.

=> 00:56:13

Ancient civilizations thrived under the lunar systems, but when the sun took over after the collapse of the vapor canopy, everything changed.

The discussion begins with the vapor canopy, a concept that suggests a time when lunar systems were thriving. During this period, there were numerous moon wheels in existence, which correspond to the 12 houses of the solar zodiac that we recognize today. This zodiac is what we are told in modern publications is very ancient, including signs like Taurus, Gemini, and Aries.

The subject matter of this video will delve into the lunar Zodiacs, which actually support the argument that ancient civilizations agreed on one thing: the Moon is older than the Sun. It is important to remember that in 2239 BC, the collapse of the vapor canopy occurred, marking the time when the Sun first appeared. This event coincided with the rise of the patriarchy and the subsequent collapse of lunar systems.

Additionally, there is a mention of a Tarot deck, which will be explored further in the discussion. The speaker emphasizes the need to understand Tarot to truly grasp the concepts being presented.

The conversation shifts to Maurice Demers, who is knowledgeable about the Robert Phoenix deal and the issues surrounding the creamies. The speaker recalls meeting Freeman Fry, a pioneer of the truther movement, and expresses a willingness to have him on the channel for discussions.

The focus then turns to ancient texts from India, such as the Ramayana and Mahabharata, which are over 3,000 years old. Despite their age, these texts provide no hint of the zodiac. The speaker then poses a question about the Americas, specifically the Maya civilization. The Maya believed in 13 heavens, each ruled by an epic, with each epic consisting of 144,000 turnings of the stars, equating to 400 years on a 360-day count system. This totals 1,872,000 days, which is perfectly divisible by 13.

However, the Maya do not seem to possess any knowledge of the zodiac, as there are no Mayan stellai, releases, or temples that reference it. This absence of zodiac knowledge extends to other ancient cultures, including the Olmec, Zapotec, and various North American Native American tribes such as the Algonquin, Cherokee, and Seminole.

The speaker also mentions the Japanese tradition, particularly the Nihon Shoki, which similarly shows no hint of the zodiac. The same is true for Chinese traditions, which did not reference the zodiac until the Han Dynasty, a time when China had contact with Rome. This interaction occurred during the height of Roman power, particularly through the Silk Road.

In conclusion, the speaker reflects on their sojourn through the Pacific, referencing the works of David Hatcher Childress, Thor Heyerdahl, and others. They emphasize that throughout their research, including Cook's logs, no evidence of zodiac knowledge was found among the Melanesians, Polynesians, Micronesians, or any other Pacific Islanders. Instead, these cultures primarily had stellar theologies, relying on the stars in the night sky for their understanding of the cosmos.

=> 01:01:06

The absence of zodiac references in ancient Jewish texts raises questions about the intersection of culture and astronomy in historical narratives.

The discussion revolves around the historical context of Roman power and its interactions with China, particularly through the Silk Road Amazon program. This collaboration involved the movement of merchandise across the continent of Asia, indicating a significant connection between the two civilizations.

In my exploration of the Pacific, influenced by the works of David Hatcher Childress, Thor Heyerdahl, and other pioneers, I delved into Captain Cook's logs. Throughout this research, I found that the Melanesians, Polynesians, Micronesians, Pacific Islanders, Easter Islanders, and Northern Pacific groups, including the Hawaiians, possessed only stellar theologies. They were situated in the vastness of the ocean, and their understanding of the stars was profound; however, there was not a hint of the knowledge of the zodiac. This absence presents a challenge for scholars like Graham Hancock.

As we delve deeper, it becomes evident that in the entire Old Testament, from Genesis through Malachi, there is not a hint of the zodiac. This absence is also reflected in the Torah, the Tanakh, the Talmud, and the midrashic commentaries. It is crucial to let this fact sink in: nowhere in ancient Jewish literature do we find any knowledge or recognition of the zodiac. This is a significant issue.

I often provide PDFs for further research, and I urge you not to return to Archaics arguing that Moses or Maimonides wrote extensively about the zodiac. The facts are clear: no ancient Jewish texts mention a zodiac. When I refer to this, I mean that there are no references in the Talmud, the midrashic texts, the Torah, or the Tanakh. The Old Testament does not contain any mention of the zodiac.

Moses Maimonides lived 900 years ago, by which time the zodiac was already 900 years old. We will explore this further. There exists a long list of authors who wrote about astronomy, star theology, and various belief systems, yet not one of them mentioned the zodiac.

Let me share this list with you. Babylonian priest historian Berossus, who studied at the Alexandrian library, did not write about it. What about Monaco? We have cited him many times, yet there is not a hint of any knowledge of the zodiac in his writings. He was an Egyptian writer during the Greek period.

Many of you admire Flavius Josephus and often cite him. However, after reading his works such as The Apion, War of the Jews, and Antiquities, I found no reference to a zodiac. Josephus was entirely unaware of it, which is a significant point to note.

As we continue this exploration, I want to share my enthusiasm for Herodotus of Halicarnassus. I also have his book, along with three additional books from William Corliss that I acquired during my trip to New Mexico. These books, which were loaned to me, include Biological Anomalies in Humans and Ancient Man: A Handbook of Puzzling Artifacts. They contain incredible findings from around the world that are often overlooked in contemporary discussions.

William Corliss's work on neglected geological anomalies is fascinating, and I have already produced two videos based on his research, with more content to come.

=> 01:06:12

Ancient texts reveal a surprising absence of the zodiac, challenging our understanding of historical astronomy.

During our time at the restaurant, we took some pictures that will be posted on Facebook and YouTube. Interestingly, she found three William Corliss books, which I have right here. These are amazing books, and we are going to create videos based on their content. I previously told you guys about William Corliss and his work on biological anomalies in humans and Ancient Man: A Handbook of Puzzling Artifacts. This book is one of my favorites from my time in prison; it contains incredible findings from all over the world that many people aren't even discussing on YouTube channels.

Corliss's work also covers neglected geological anomalies, and I truly admire his contributions. I've already produced two videos based on his material, and there are more on the way.

Now, let’s dive into some historical references. A Phoenician historian named Sanchuniathon, who lived around 1000 BC, wrote a compelling history of ancient events during pre-Greek times. Interestingly, there is not a hint of knowledge of a zodiac in his writings. Similarly, Livy, a Roman historian, and Pliny the Elder, who authored Natural History and wrote extensively about the stars, also never mentions the zodiac in his works.

Strabo, a Greek geographer, wrote about the Great Pyramid but did not reference the zodiac either. His counterpart, Diodorus Siculus, was equally prolific in his writings and also made no mention of the zodiac. We have these writings, yet Thales of Miletus, who predicted the darkening of the sun during the great battle between the Medes and the Lydians in 583 BC, also did not mention the zodiac. This battle led to a peace treaty, which is recorded at the monument called Yasiliqah, depicting the kings of the opposing armies forging an alliance after five years of warfare, both holding an eclipsed sun—not a normal eclipse, but something else entirely.

Anaxagoras and Anaximander also failed to mention the zodiac in their works. Thucydides, who recorded everything like Herodotus, specialized in military campaigns but also did not hint at the zodiac. Even Hipparchus made no mention of it.

Here’s where it gets particularly intriguing: ancient Greeks claimed there were 1,080 stars in the firmament, but they were mistaken. Older Greeks, like Hipparchus, suggested there were 10,800 stars, with all the other stars moving a little bit. The significance lies in the number itself and its connection to the idea of luminaries. You may know that the Great Pyramid is associated with the number 2,1080.

Now, let’s connect this to the Trojan War, which we know about through the writings of Homer, who emerged as the first of the great Greek epic writers around 800 BC, after a 300-year Dark Age. This Dark Age was caused by the Phoenix in 1135 BC, during the final year of Pharaoh Seneferu.

Homer wrote an epic called The Iliad, which is packed with data, yet there is not a single hint of knowledge of a zodiac in it. For those who might question whether Homer truly lacked knowledge of the zodiac, I encourage you to read The Odyssey. In this work about Odysseus, you will also find no knowledge of a zodiac present.

Given this context, it should not be surprising that the next Greek writer, Hesiod, who appeared around the same time, wrote Theogony, which encompasses the religion of the Greeks, detailing gods and stars. However, nothing about the zodiac is included in Theogony. This absence is indeed a problem.

You would think that since Hesiod wrote the first Farmer's Almanac, titled Works and Days, there would be some mention of the zodiac. Yet, there is no reference to a zodiac, no way to measure time, and no mention of the 12 houses of the sun or signs like Libra, Gemini, or Aquarius.

=> 01:11:26

The absence of the zodiac in ancient Greek literature raises questions about its historical significance and origins.

In examining the historical context of the zodiac, it is clear that there's no knowledge of a zodiac in The Odyssey; it simply isn't present. Now, since you know that, it shouldn't be a problem for you to digest that the next Greek writer who appeared around the same time was Hesiod, who wrote Theogony. This work encapsulated the religion of the Greeks, detailing the gods and stars, yet nothing about the zodiac is in Theogony. This absence presents a significant problem.

You would think that since Hesiod wrote the first Farmer's Almanac, called Works and Days, there would be some mention of the zodiac; however, there is nothing in there about a zodiac. There is no way to measure time, no twelve houses of the sun, and no mention of Libra, Gemini, Aquarius, or Scorpio. The great Greek epic writers simply did not know of the zodiac, which is indeed a problem.

Another writer to consider is Theognis, who was also prolific. Although we do not have many of his writings, we do have one substantial epic, and again, nothing about the zodiac can be found. Additionally, we have Lucretius, who wrote about the Phoenix, the recents, and the history of the world measured in earthquakes. Lucretius even noted that an object at fixed times darkens the Sun and is unknown to astronomy due to the irregularity of its appearance. He wrote On the Origin of the Universe, which consists of 7,300 lines, yet there is not a hint in Lucretius that he had any knowledge of a zodiac.

One must wonder if all these ancient Greek writers would have omitted something so easy to weave into their narratives. The answer is clear: they did not mention it. Pulsodynius, Aristarchus, and even Virgil, who wrote The Aeneid in the Greek style, also left out any reference to the zodiac. Aristophanes, known for his plays like The Birds, similarly omitted it.

What about Plato, often quoted by Graham Hancock regarding Atlantis and its supposed timeline of 9,000 years before Solon? It is interesting to note that Plato never once mentioned the zodiac. This omission raises questions about Aristotle, his student, who wrote Posterior Analytics and many other technical texts about the stars and nature, yet he too did not write about the zodiac.

I can already anticipate that people will try to process this information and wrap it around their own paradigms. For instance, some might argue that the zodiac isn't everything via symbology and metaphor. While that perspective is valid, it is important to recognize that it is all ex post facto. I will elaborate on this shortly, as I intend to show you where the zodiac actually came from.

We have listed numerous ancient authors, epics, and texts from civilizations that are supposed to be very old, such as the Egyptians, the Chinese, and the people of India. Yet, nothing—no zodiac, guys. Tacitus, Plutarch, Marcus Varro, Seneca, Cicero—the list goes on. I could name every single writer of the ancient world, but I will refrain from doing so; I have provided enough examples.

Now, if that is the case, let's delve into what the Greeks actually knew. This is where it gets quite Twilight Zone-ish. It is not my intention for you to interpret these facts in the same way I do; rather, it is my interest that you have these facts. Perhaps you will see something I am not seeing. Right now, I am presenting you with the facts.

=> 01:16:19

Ancient Greek mythology has no mention of the zodiac, revealing a gap between what we think we know and the historical facts.

In discussing the ancient world, one might feel overwhelmed by the vast number of writers and thinkers. However, I will not attempt to name every single one; instead, I will provide a few examples to illustrate my points.

Now, let's delve into the Greeks and explore what they knew. This topic can feel quite Twilight Zone-ish, as it challenges our understanding of history. It is not my intention for you to interpret these facts solely through my lens; rather, I want you to have access to these facts so that you might see something I may have overlooked. I am presenting you with the business—the facts—as they are.

There is a significant issue with many modern books that attempt to explain events from 11,600 years ago or 9,600 years ago, particularly concerning the Younger Dryas period. The claims made by Graham Hancock regarding Göbekli Tepe are particularly contentious. When it comes to the Minoan civilization on Crete and Thera, as well as across Santorini, it is essential to clarify that there was no Minoan zodiac, nor did the Mycenaean civilization possess one. Argos had no zodiac, and none of the ancient pre-Greek civilizations had any form of zodiac; it was simply unknown. Scholars agree that there are no ancient Greek depictions related to the zodiac until around 100 B.C. This date aligns with findings from the Chinese and Romans, as well as the Dendera zodiac in Egypt.

I urge you to really process this information. I will state it twice for emphasis: In the whole of Greek mythology, which includes hundreds of anecdotes and stories about heroes like Hercules, God Zeus, and the Olympians, there are no mentions of the zodiac. None. Let that sink in for a moment before I move on to the next series of facts.

As I engage with you, I appreciate the participation in the chat, with 1,449 viewers present. While I have received half of that in likes, it's important to note that likes do not significantly affect the algorithm; they are more of an ego boost.

I also want to remind you of a previous video where I explained how the Oracle of Dodona, the Oracle of Delphi, the Oracle of Pythia, and the Oracle of Olympia operated. These ancient oracles were part of a well-organized intelligence operation. They were not merely predicting the future or providing insights; we have enough fragments from ancient Greek writers to understand how these oracles functioned.

When individuals came to offer their treasures—gifts, money, wealth, goats, herds—they were often made to wait for three to seven days, sometimes even 14 days, depending on the nature of their inquiries. During this waiting period, runners would travel between oracles, exchanging intelligence daily. For instance, a runner would arrive at the Dodona oracle, and the priests would secretly review all the dispatches, gathering information from the other oracles. They had intelligence from every region, including updates from outside Greece.

Agents of the oracles frequented shipyards and ports where travelers gathered. They would often engage in casual conversations, offering a copper coin or purchasing some water, cheese, bread, or wine, all while gathering news from overseas. For example, they might ask, "Hey man, what's going on in Carthage?" This network of information exchange was crucial to the functioning of these ancient oracles.

=> 01:21:33

The ancient oracles were the original intelligence agencies, trading secrets and insights long before the zodiac ever entered the picture.

The Oracle would make them wait, but on a daily basis, Runners from Oracle to Oracle were trading intelligence. Each day, a runner would make it to the Dodona Oracle, where the priests would secretly go through all the dispatches. They would see everything that was being recorded in the other five or six oracles, gathering intelligence from every region, even information about what was going on outside of Greece.

Agents of the oracles were often found hanging out at all the shipyards and ports, in all the places where sojourners and travelers occupied. They would routinely give a copper or buy someone some water, cheese, bread, or wine, just to gather news from overseas. They would ask questions like, “Hey man, what's going on in Carthage? What’s happening over there in Joppa? I heard things weren't going well in Egypt.” They were trained to do this, filtering tremendous amounts of data to the oracles, even from the other oracles.

In order to question the goddess and bring inquiries into the Oracle, the oracular priest required that you came with Clean Hands. This meant you had to divulge everything you knew about what you were asking. The priests would take this information and send it to all the other oracles, sharing updates like, “This is what's happening over here in Anatolia,” or “Things are chaotic in Ionia.” They would also relay information about a banker in Mytilene who was contemplating pulling all his holdings out and seeking the goddess's advice on whether that was a good idea. Another oracle might have information from a Macedonian who was already in league with the Thracians, discussing plans to raid Mytilene and whether the goddess would grant them permission.

There was nothing divine or supernatural about it; the Oracles of the ancient Greek world were essentially intelligence operations, and that’s how they made their money. They were very good at what they did.

The reason I’m sharing this is to draw your attention to a video I made a year ago about the Oracles of Dodona, Pythia, Olympia, and the most famous one, the Oracle of Delphi. Not a hint of the zodiac has been found in those temples—no artwork, no traditions concerning the oracles using the zodiac to divine anything. This was not done because the zodiac was unknown when those oracles were in operation. After the fall of these oracles and their raiding by Roman armies, the oracles were considered holy ground. Even the Persians didn’t sack the oracular temples, but the Romans did.

It was after the Romans that the Sybils compiled all their knowledge into books, leading to the Sibylline Oracles, which had copies in the Roman Senate. However, in the books of the Sybils, there is no mention of the zodiac, which presents a significant problem.

When we look at the ancient Greeks, we have more information through Calisthenes and others about the life of Alexander of Macedon, who eventually sat on the throne of Babylon and became Alexander the Great. We have more data about him than anyone else, and guess what? There is nothing from the third and fourth century BC about the knowledge of the zodiac—nowhere in any of those traditions. That’s quite embarrassing.

But we will get to the zodiac, and I will tell you exactly where it came from. I don’t care if people unsubscribe because they disagree with me; let them go. What really amuses me is that some stick around long enough to announce they’re leaving. If that’s the case, just go. Let’s move on.

=> 01:26:22

The true essence of ancient astrology has been distorted into a modern construct that strays far from its original purity.

There is nothing from the third and fourth century BC about the knowledge of the zodiac; nowhere in any of those traditions can it be found. That's embarrassing—that's totally embarrassing. However, we're going to get to the Zodiac, and I will tell you exactly where it came from.

I don't care if they unsubscribe because if someone disagrees with me and they choose to unsubscribe, I don't even care—let them go. Let them go; it doesn't even matter. What really amuses me is that you stuck around long enough to tell us you were going to unsubscribe. Man, just go; let's get out of here.

Naturally, if you're going to go through ancient civilizations, ancient epics, ancient literature, and all the ancient authors, and you don't find any references to a zodiac at all, then quite naturally, I’m going to keep going. So where do I go? I go to the early Church Fathers to see who knew about a zodiac. Check this out: three of the earliest Church Fathers—Clement of Rome and Polycarp—are two right there, but they don't mention the Zodiac. Of all the things that they complain about, they don't mention a zodiac. But I'll tell you who does: Tatian the Syrian.

In 170 A.D., Tatian the Syrian mentions the Zodiac in passing, stating that it is demonic in origin, but he doesn't say anything else. This is the very first time that a Christian author mentioned the Zodiac in the Anno Domini period. Jesus was supposed to have been crucified in 33 A.D., which makes Tatian's mention of the zodiac almost 140 years later. This makes Tatian the Syrian the first to mention the zodiac in the Christian narrative.

What's interesting is that it's still within 250 years of the appearance of the first zodiac in Egypt, the Greek zodiac at Dendera. I will tell you the citation by Tatian the Syrian, but we have a problem with the early Church Fathers. There was a man named Irenaeus (some people pronounce it as Irinius or Ironyers) of Lyons in Gaul, who wrote a book called Against Heresies around 175 A.D..

I need to correct myself: he wrote a book that listed all the things that were heretical, against the Church, against God, and that were demonic. Nowhere in that list is the Zodiac mentioned. Tatian the Syrian, at the same time, knew about the Zodiac but didn't say much about it. The legitimacy of Tatian's book is something to consider; you have to understand that I’m giving it face value because there are scholars who claim that many of the early Christian records we have today are not original. We're just taking it on faith that the Roman Church had accurate copies. All we have are copies; we don’t have any originals. So yes, Rome could have made up all that—we don’t know.

It's all interesting, though, and I’m going to drop a couple of bombs on you real quick because that’s what I do. I enjoy the reactions, and I’m going to watch this comment thread right here. Here’s something you need to know: there are no references to the Zodiac in the Dead Sea Scrolls. I’m going to let you think about that for a minute, and then I’m going to hit you with another one.

Laureen Damore, I'm not arguing that. I'm not talking—don't confuse the two. I am not launching an attack against astrology; I am merely offering evidence that the true science of astrology, which is ancient, was very recently hijacked and put into this construct. This is not old; this is deceitful. The astrologies of the Ancients were far purer; this is an artificial version imposed on something far more ancient.

No, Dawn, if you're listening, would you please bring me my laptop cord? I exchanged laptops to get this video to go out; that's why I was late on this.

=> 01:31:17

Astrology's ancient wisdom has been distorted into a modern construct, lacking true biblical roots.

In this discussion, I want to clarify my position regarding astrology. I am not launching an attack against astrology; rather, I am merely offering evidence that the true science of astrology, which is ancient, was very recently hijacked and put into a construct that is not old. This current version is deceitful; the astrologies of the Ancients were far purer. What we see today is an artificial version imposed on something far more ancient.

Now, if Dawn is listening, could you please bring me my laptop cord? I had to exchange laptops to get this video out, which is why I was late. The other laptop is malfunctioning, so I'm using my good laptop, but I need the power cable, which is in the kitchen.

Moving on to the topic at hand, let's discuss the Dead Sea Scrolls. Not a hint of the zodiac can be found there. Interestingly, there is another collection of ancient scrolls and books that was discovered almost at the same time as the Dead Sea Scrolls. This collection consists of 52 documents from ancient Egypt, known as the Nag Hammadi Library. Thank you for that. It contains over 1200 pages of data. Some of you might know more about this than I do, and I welcome any corrections if I'm wrong. However, I don’t recall any references to the zodiac in the Nag Hammadi codices. I have several texts from the Nag Hammadi Library here, and after flipping through them, I couldn't find anything related to the zodiac. I read all that were available in English about ten years ago, and I still don’t remember any zodiacal information in those texts. If that's true, that's terrible.

Now, let’s take a moment to consider the broader context. For those who may not know, you can try to list examples of how stories serve as metaphors or examples of the zodiac, but the actual zodiac itself has no reference in the Old Testament. In fact, there is also no reference to the zodiac in the New Testament. The New Testament is an anomaly, and we will discuss that in a moment.

Many of you are fond of The Book of Enoch, but there is also no reference to the zodiac in The Book of Enoch. I apologize for the confusion, but there are hundreds of books that discuss the mazaroth in the Old Testament, as mentioned in the Book of Job. However, if you study that word, you will find that even scholars disagree on its meaning. It doesn’t even matter if it does mean "signs," because much of the older scholarly work on the word mazaroth specifically translates it as constellations or star groups. This is not a reference to the zodiac at all.

If the Old Testament contains so many books divided into hundreds, maybe even a thousand chapters, and hundreds of thousands of words, yet there is no description anywhere of the twelve houses of the Sun, then there is simply no zodiac. Your argument hinges on the fact that there is only one word in the Old Testament that might refer to the zodiac, which is mazaroth. However, even scholars claim that it does not refer to the zodiac; it is merely a reference to stars.

This does not qualify as a reference to the zodiac, my brother. It doesn’t matter that "zodiac" is a Greek word meaning "animal circle"; in Hebrew, none of that matters. There is no description of the zodiac anywhere in the Old Testament. You can cling to all these little nuances that you want, but the teaching and description of the zodiac are simply absent from the Bible.

=> 01:35:55

The ancient world was captivated by celestial movements, not the zodiac; they focused on stars like Venus and Orion, while the concept of the zodiac emerged much later and went largely unnoticed.

The discussion surrounding the 12 houses of the Sun and the Zodiac reveals a significant gap in ancient texts. Despite thousands of words written, there is no description anywhere of the 12 houses of the Sun, nor is there a comprehensive reference to the Zodiac in the Old Testament. The only term that might relate to the Zodiac is mazaroth, but even scholars argue that it merely refers to stars and does not constitute a Zodiac. This distinction is crucial; it highlights that the teaching of the Zodiac and its description are absent from the Bible.

One could argue extensively about this topic, yet the fact remains: there is no Zodiac in the Book of Enoch or any other ancient texts. Many writings attempt to make cognitive leaps and extrapolate more data than what is actually presented, leading to confusion. It is essential to note that the Zodiac appeared during the Roman period, heavily influenced by Greek themes and symbols, which were themselves derived from Near Eastern cultures, particularly Mesopotamia.

If the Zodiac held such importance in the ancient world, one must question why there are no representations of it found in frescoes, walls, statuary, or monuments. Why are there no Zodiac statues or temples dedicated to it? The absence of such artifacts suggests that the ancient world largely ignored the Zodiac. Furthermore, there are no Legends or Traditions from civilizations such as China, Egypt, India, or the Maya that reference the Zodiac. Libraries do not contain books on the legends and myths of the Zodiac unless they were printed recently with new data. Prior to 100 BC, it appears that the concept of the Zodiac was virtually unknown.

For those seeking specificity, the model of the Zodiac was not recognized by the world until about 75 BC. This raises a significant question: what did ancient civilizations know if they did not follow the Zodiac signs like Taurus, Gemini, or Leo? They were aware of Venus almanacs and tracked the movements of celestial bodies such as the Dog Star, known by different names across cultures. They were interested in the Seven Sisters (the Pleiades) and recognized Orion the Hunter, as well as other prominent constellations like Arcturus and the Great Bear.

The ancient civilizations were deeply engaged with astronomy, focusing on the movements of stars rather than the Zodiac. They understood the significance of the pole shift that moved Alpha Draconis to the Great Bear, marking a pivotal change in the celestial landscape. The dragon, once a prominent feature in the circumpolar heavens, eventually fell, leading to the end of the age of Darkness and the onset of the Great Flood. This event marked the birth of the sun and the beginning of calendar systems, which have been documented in various ways.

In conclusion, the astronomy of the ancient world was characterized by a focus on observable celestial phenomena, rather than the constructs of the Zodiac, which seem to have emerged much later. The question remains: who invented the Zodiac, and why does it not appear in the historical record until much later? As I continue to explore and present newer material, these questions remain central to understanding the evolution of astronomical concepts.

=> 01:41:05

Ancient civilizations understood the cosmos in ways we’ve forgotten, focusing on the moon's significance over the sun, shaping their calendars and beliefs.

When the waters broke, the age of Darkness ended. The great flood collapsed the vapor canopy, and the sun was born. Then, all of a sudden, the calendar started, which I've already documented in my Phoenix playlist. This is the astronomy of the ancient world; that's what they paid attention to. They didn't know or care about this modern BS at all. None of this is known in the ancient world at all. So, who invented it?

Oh, DJ Nick X1, I'm so busy presenting novel, newer, and newer material as I discover and integrate it with my old research. It just takes time out of my life to sit here and write books debunking people. However, anybody can go through all of my 540 videos and my dozen or so published books. They can pull out Grant Hancock, Randall Carson, Steele, and Andrew Collins' work—all these ancient alien theorists. Anyone can use my material to put together a book. Just cite Jason and Archaics, saying, "Hey man, this is what Jason said; here's what he cited, here's his source materials," and it completely collapses all this narrative.

I can do it too, but I'm just too busy steadily putting out more and more material now. You know, if my channel gets taken off YouTube sometime, that's probably exactly what I'm going to do. I'll have so much free time that I might just write books dissecting all the Hancock stuff and showing the entire world that the man not only got all the facts wrong but he knew he was publishing this information. I would probably do all that just out of his own bibliographies. But until that time happens, I'm going to continue to release more videos, which takes time.

I already know what's happening. If my channel ever does disappear, all my videos are still recorded; I put them all on Archaics TV. I'm also aware of about 40 different people who copy all my videos. They do it to keep them preserved; as soon as they appear on YouTube, they're already copying them onto hard drives, making sure that this material will always be available. Yeah, if anything ever happens to Jason, oh my God, the world is going to get flooded. So many people will just start releasing videos everywhere on all the platforms, and I'm cool with that.

So, that's the astrology, guys. The common denominator between all these civilizations is that they believed the moon was older than the sun. Remember, it was from the perspective of the vapor canopy obscuring the sun. But at nighttime, the vapor canopy diffused and watered the world every morning and every night. When it did, the remaining moisture in the mesosphere created a lens effect that magnified the stars, making the moon appear even bigger. However, as the sun appeared on the horizon, all that moisture went back up, turning into a cloudy substance in the mesosphere that blocked out the sun and created a vapor canopy. This was dead every single day.

This is why all the old calendars in the world were Day Count systems, and they considered nighttime as the first part of the day. Even in Genesis, you find, "the evening and the morning was the first day." Then God created mankind; man and woman created he them on the sixth day. Again, "the evening and the morning was the sixth day," and then God looked around and knew everything he had done was good. Finally, "the seventh day, or the evening and the morning was the seventh day."

Now, let's get to this guy in 175 A.D. We have an astronomer who is well known for his book, Almagest. He is real good and well known for his work on astronomy. He studied at the Alexandrian library in Egypt and published a book on astronomy that everybody knows about. A few years later, he publishes a second book, and this is where all this madness started. The second book is called Tetrabiblos, which means "the four books." In Alexandria, Egypt, while he is writing Tetrabiblos, someone else is writing four other books in Rome—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

=> 01:45:28

Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos didn't just shape astronomy; it laid the groundwork for a cosmic code that intertwines with the New Testament, revealing a hidden zodiacal narrative in the heart of Christianity.

In 175 A.D., we encounter an astronomer who is well-known for his book, the Almagest. He is highly regarded for his contributions to astronomy and studied at the Alexandrian Library in Egypt. After a few years, he publishes a second book, which is where all this madness began. This second book is called Tetrabiblos, meaning "the four books." While he is writing Tetrabiblos in Alexandria, Egypt, someone else is writing four other books in Rome: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

This individual, Ptolemy, is the origin of the idea that each zodiacal house comprises 30 degrees, leading to a total of 360 degrees all the way around. The model you see here has no precedent outside of Ptolemy; this is Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos model of the zodiac. Suddenly, at the same time that academia is developing a new model, we are talking about 18 centuries ago. Academia has this cipher, a cracker jack pocket decoder. As soon as the world receives this decoder, it also receives Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John at the exact same time.

In my Dark Scriptures playlist, I delve into how the New Testament was written, what it says, and what it does not say at all. For the first time in history, it is crucial to remember that there is not a hint of the zodiac in all of Greek mythology, even though the zodiac is very Greek. We find ourselves in a unique situation because, with Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, the stories begin to take on zodiacal proportions. Many elements in the New Testament mirror the ideas and concepts of the zodiac, including the identities, acts, and names of the 12 Apostles.

This is not merely conjecture; you must refer back to original materials, such as the research of Gerald Massey. He wrote four substantial books titled Natural Genesis (Volumes One and Two) and Ancient Egypt: Light of the World (Volumes One and Two). All four books combined are quite extensive, and it is a coincidence that they comprise four volumes. Massey published these works in the 1880s, and he meticulously examines the New Testament, demonstrating that it is a zodiac code throughout.

The Tetrabiblos was originally written to introduce this concept to the intellectual elite of the time, while the four gospels were published to provide them with something to decode. For those interested in astral theology, figures like Santos Bonacci offer valuable insights. He delves into the connections between the New Testament and the zodiac, and while he is not the only one, he is among the most well-known.

It is intriguing that the model used by Graham Hancock involves a 25,920-year cycle, yet there is no mention of that cycle in Tetrabiblos, which introduced this zodiacal model. This absence highlights the depth of the symbolism. At the same time that this model was created, based on the four corners of Heaven and the four quadrants of Heaven—the bull, the lion, the eagle, and the man's face—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were being provided.

In the Revelation text, which is also known as the Apocalypse (meaning to uncover), we see that this is precisely what a cracker jack decoder model does: it unveils and pulls back the cover. This decoding device allows mankind to receive interpretations of the Book of Revelation, particularly the first four seals, through the Tetramorph. The Tetramorph, which features four heads, represents a Divine Angel, and in the center of the Tetramorph is the Throne of God.

=> 01:50:46

The Book of Revelation is a cosmic decoder, revealing the hidden connections between celestial symbols and earthly events.

Symbolism goes hand in hand with the creation of a model based on the four corners of Heaven. This model encompasses the four quadrants of Heaven: the bull, the lion, the eagle, and the man's face. Additionally, it includes the four royal stars, which separate the Zodiac into a square. At the same time, we are provided with the figures of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John in the text of Revelation, which is also known as the Apocalypse. The term "apocalypse" means to uncover, which is precisely what a Cracker Jack decoder model does; it unveils and pulls back the cover. This model serves as a decoding device.

Mankind has been given interpretations of the Book of Revelation, particularly concerning the first four seals. This interpretation is guided by the tetramorph, which has four heads and is a Divine Angel. In the center of the tetramorph is the Throne of God, where God sits. The first four seals are broken, and one of the faces on the tetramorph tells John—whose real name is John Oweny's—what the first seal is, followed by the second, third, and fourth Horsemen. When the fifth seal is broken, it does not pertain to events in heaven or on Earth; rather, it involves events occurring elsewhere. A voice like many waters emanates from the middle of the tetramorph, introducing the fifth seal. This seal deals with Souls that are at an altar, waiting for their transformation until God ends the world in the tribulation, allowing them to be redeemed. God instructs them to wait a small season. The tetramorph does not engage with the fifth seal, as these events do not happen on Earth.

It is essential to remember that these are symbols found in the sky, yet they relate to events on Earth. Gerald Massey, when discussing astral theology, emphasizes the importance of understanding the symbols: the lion, the bull, the eagle, and the man's face, which are also represented in the Zodiac. They decode the Apocalypse, starting with the Book of Revelation, which is filled with astral theology. The entire Book of Revelation is rich with these symbols, found repeatedly throughout the text.

However, this is not the case with the Old Testament. In contrast, the New Testament presents various correlates with this decoder, which can be likened to a Cracker Jack decoder ring. It is important to note that the Zodiac is not ancient. I acknowledge that I may have upset some people with my video regarding the Antiquity of the tarot card system. These tarot decks, which I have here, are divided into major Arcana and minor Arcana. I purchased this deck as a gift for someone; it holds no personal value to me, but it is quite nice.

The Tarot deck is relatively young, only about 400 to 460 years old, developed in France. The creators were fascinated with Egyptian symbols. Originally, it was a deck of playing cards that was later expanded. The 12 major Arcana cards are not just numbered 12 like the Zodiac; they represent the 12 symbols of the Zodiac. This further indicates that the Tarot system is not ancient; it is significantly younger than the creation of Ptolemy's Zodiac.

In light of all this information, we can conclude that the Zodiac is not old at all. It did not undergo a long developmental process. In my previous discussions about the Zodiac, I presented a chart showing every piece of evidence of the Zodiac in the ancient world, demonstrating that it is not ancient. We are led to believe by Graham Hancock that the Zodiac is so ancient that at Göbekli Tepe, there are symbols on the pillars that supposedly prove the existence of these ancient beliefs.

=> 01:55:22

The zodiac is a modern construct, not an ancient truth, and the narratives built around it are misleading.

The 12 symbols of the zodiac further illustrate that the tarot system is not old at all. In fact, it is a lot younger than the actual creation of Ptolemy's zodiac. In light of all this information, we now know that the zodiac is not old at all; it didn't go through a long developmental process. In my other zodiac presentation, I show a chart that details every piece of evidence of the zodiac in the ancient world, and it becomes clear that it is simply not old.

We are led to believe by Graham Hancock that the zodiac is so ancient that at Göbekli Tepe—however you say that word—there are symbols on the pillars that prove these people were following zodiacal ages 9,000 years ago. Hancock and many other authors have all borrowed into the archaeological astronomy models of the 25,920-year history of the zodiac calendar to perpetuate a model of Earth history that is untrue. They use this model to date ancient structures and to discuss Atlantis beyond the confines of the historical record.

Remember, when it comes to Atlantis, it’s not just the 9,000 years. I have a bullet point presentation on YouTube that shows you all the facts of the Plato narrative, and they only fit in the 13th century BC. You can even eliminate the 9,000-year mistake, which was according to Eudoxus of Cnidus, only 9,000 moons. We can forgive Plato for that, but everything else he said only fits in the 13th century BC. It’s not just the 9,000-year mistake; it’s all the details of the Atlantis narrative.

So, remember, guys, Jason didn’t bring us to the table. I’m just reminding you of what over 50 other books by academics and scholars have already said. This is why academia laughs at Graham Hancock; they think, "Man, you don’t know anything." This begs the question, though: if you don’t know what you’re talking about and you can’t cite accurate sources, and when you do cite sources, you twist them and lie, then it begs the question—who do you work for? Why is this narrative being promoted? You and your buddies are publishing these books, getting hundreds of thousands of sales, and it’s all bogus and easily disproven. Academics and scholars have long been writing articles explaining how all this is total BS.

There are many academics who laugh at Graham Hancock for these reasons. Yet, he consistently appears on platforms like Joe Rogan and London Real, where he laments the fact that "the establishment doesn’t like me." Well, Jason of Arcadia doesn’t like you either, but for totally different reasons. I can see that everything you put out is agenda-driven. So, I want to know: who is funding all this? Who is funding all these lies?

Göbekli Tepe is not ancient; I have a whole video showing you the same symbols at Easter Island, where academia swears up and down that Easter Island is not even 600 years old. The lies go deeper and deeper. There is no zodiac calendar; the zodiac was invented recently. Therefore, Graham Hancock and all these others cannot date history accurately. They can’t date Jericho, they can’t date Babylon, they can’t date ancient Egypt, and they definitely can’t date Göbekli Tepe by anything related to a zodiac. Just because there’s a scorpion effigy on one of the pillars, it doesn’t mean that it must be Scorpio—that is so stupid.

I lose IQ points every time I think about that. You guys know I have already proven my case. I have invited anyone in the world who wants to debate about Atlantis not being 9,600 BC. All this zodiacal dating of 9,000 years has been incorrect; we are done with that. We are finished with the Sumerian, Babylonian, and ancient Hindu false dating of years when it was only days. I have already overkilled it; I have proven my case in my published books, and that was a decade ago. Now, I have reiterated everything with even new data in my YouTube presentations. The 432,000 cycles of the Anunnaki was only 12 centuries, or 432,000 turnings of the stars.

=> 01:59:51

The truth about ancient civilizations is buried under layers of deception, and it's time to uncover the real history behind the myths.

About that, so you guys know, I've already proven my case. I have already invited anybody in the world that wants to debate about it—about Atlantis not being 9600 BC. So all this zodiacal dating of the 9,000 years has been correct; we're done with that. Wrap it up, done. We're done with the Sumerian, Babylonian, and ancient Hindu false dating of years when it was only days. We're done with that. I have already overkilled it; I have proven my case in my published books. That was a decade ago, but now I have reiterated everything with even new data in my YouTube presentations.

The 432,000 chars of the Annunaki was only 12 centuries—432,000 turnings of the Stars. Remember, Char does not mean year. Zechariah Sitchin introduced that based on erroneous translations of Berossus. Shar never meant year because other academics have shown us that ship manifests, where cargo was measured in chars, indicate you can't measure packages in shars if Char means year. So anyway, I have already shown the Olmec and my encounters have already corrected these for you guys. I have provided overwhelming evidence that these are the true calendars of the ancient world, not the false zodiac calendar. All of Graham Hancock's assertions are in error. This isn't a simple mistake, guys; it's a mistake across the board on every category. Therefore, I have to question who does he work for.

This gets deep; it gets serious, guys. This isn't something—these aren't simple mistakes at all. I've also shown you in my dark scriptures playlist that all my dark scripture, the Old and New Testaments, are all borrowed from older sources and written many times over, changed and edited heavily, borrowing from Babylonian and Greek mythology. But it is very damning that in the whole of Greek mythology, we don't have any knowledge of the zodiac. That's condemning because the zodiac is basically based on Greek and Babylonian symbols.

Now we have to go to alchemy. I asked you guys earlier, so what are they hiding? Why all this deceit? Why put out millions of dollars worth of books by about 13 different authors distributed all over the world, painting this huge 11,000 BC to 9000 BC civilization? This whole recent deal—why go through all this trouble of promoting a whole false idea of the zodiac calendar that helps you date paradigms that you invent and make up? It allows you to date real archaeological sites that aren't even that old. Remember, I asked that earlier. I do not intend in my videos to ask questions that I'm not going to answer. We're about to get to that now.

I have shown many times in the alchemical woodcuts. You guys remember my past presentations? I show these beautiful treatises of alchemy where they show humans chained to a zodiacal construct in the sky. They show pictures of the Garden of Eden; they show pictures of hills and in the secret caverns in the hills, the elite are all dressed up, eating at tables in a banquet while people on the surface are naked, scratching the ground. It's all there, guys. I show you in those alchemical treatises these elaborate pictures that are showing us resets, showing us the victims on the surface and the survivors in the Underworld. They're showing us how humans are chained to a vast construct. It is always the zodiac.

In the simple, I've shown you in these pictures where the Phoenix is often hidden—a bird inside of a triangle, the pyramid. Sometimes the word Phoenix is hidden in the leaves. I've shown these guys, and I'm not done. I have another video coming out where I'm going to show you image after image after image after image of everything I'm telling you now. Over like I like to do, I like to overwhelm you with data. I like to leave absolutely no seal unpatched, so that's coming. But some of you have already seen those videos; you know what I'm talking about.

These alchemical woodcuts, in this artwork, these illustrations, and these paintings, they're all highly coded imagery. They all use the Old Testament and the New Testament and Greek mythology, all presented to us through carefully filtered Jewish symbolism. All the alchemical texts have Hebrew writing, Hebrew numbers, and Jewish symbols. All the alchemical texts that show all this stuff—every bit of it—they all have cabalic elements.

=> 02:04:38

The Phoenix symbolizes a hidden cyclical reset, lurking in alchemical art while mysteriously absent from major religious texts and mythology.

Everything I'm telling you now is overwhelming, and I like to leave absolutely no seal unpatched. Some of you have already seen those videos, and you know what I'm talking about. The alchemical woodcuts in this artwork, these illustrations, and these paintings are all highly coded imagery. They utilize Old Testament, New Testament, and Greek mythology, all presented to us through carefully filtered Jewish symbolism.

All the alchemical texts contain Hebrew writing, Hebrew numbers, and Jewish symbols. Every bit of it has Kabbalistic Hebrew references. The alchemical paintings are filled with these elements; they are everywhere. The Zodiacs are found throughout alchemy, and both the Kabbalah and Zodiac feature heavily in the tarot cards as well. For those of you who are not subscribed to our KXTV, I won't say much more here, but on Archangels TV, I have videos that show you this exact same time in history—135 A.D., during the Bar Kokhba Rebellion when Rome destroyed Jerusalem. The Jews instantly created a secret fraternal organization to infiltrate European society, one of the first names being Freemasonry. For any more data on that, you'll have to go to our KXTV.

Zodiacs and Kabbalistic references are found everywhere in alchemy and in all the alchemical premises. Having isolated all this crossover, we must understand what is being hidden through this process. The Old Testament is supposed to be a record of mankind's history through the lens of the people trying to follow God's word. However, nowhere in the Old Testament is there a single reference to the Phoenix.

In the New Testament, there is also not a single reference to the Phoenix. Get this, guys—the entire spectrum of Greek mythology does not contain one story about the Phoenix. Do you remember that time when Hercules went over that hill and fought the Phoenix? No, you don't remember it because the Phoenix is unknown in the entire spectrum of Greek mythology. Ancient Greek writers did write about the Phoenix, but it wasn't in mythology; it symbolized a cyclical reset.

Nowhere in the Greek stories does the Phoenix make an appearance. So, the Zodiac—this right here—is where the Phoenix should be. Do you see a Phoenix on the Zodiac? I’ll give you a minute to process that. I’m not talking about the Mary Kay cosmetics new oracle cards or the teenage girl version of tarot cards. There are like 80 different types of tarot decks now, but I am referring to the original tarot cards—74 cards, 12 major Arcana, and the rest minor Arcana. In the original tarot cards, there is not one single Phoenix card.

Remember, I asked you a question: What are they trying to hide? In the artwork of alchemy, only in the alchemical treatises that Martin has shown on his channel and I have shown on mine does the Phoenix suddenly make an appearance. The Phoenix is everywhere; it is often depicted close to the Sun. Sometimes, it is hidden in the foliage or in the patterns of a frame. The word Phoenix is found everywhere in Greek, and the Hebrew word for Phoenix is also present. Sometimes they use ROK, which is a reference to the Phoenix. In Arabic, Roc is also a reference to the Phoenix.

=> 02:09:28

The truth about our history is often hidden in plain sight, waiting for those willing to dig deeper.

Remember I asked you a question: what are they trying to hide? In the artwork of alchemy, particularly in the alchemical treatises that Martin has showcased on his channel and that I have presented on mine, only in these does the Phoenix make an appearance. The Phoenix is everywhere; it's at the top and is always shown close to the Sun. Sometimes, the Phoenix is hidden in the foliage or concealed within the patterns of a frame.

The word "Phoenix" is found everywhere, including in Greek. The Hebrew word for Phoenix is also present, and sometimes they use "ROK" (Roc), which is a reference to the Phoenix. In Arabic and Persian contexts, it's quite interesting, guys. When it comes to the alchemical practices depicted in the artwork, you can see the elite in the underground having fun while people on the surface are scratching the ground for an existence. You see humans chained to the Zodiac. I'm not making any of this up; it's all very easy to see on my channel right now in my older videos.

It's crazy; the alchemical imagery is telling us the truth. That's why we're going to do some videos on that. The Phoenix knowledge has been deliberately scrubbed from historical references, but it resurfaced in 1948. Here is a collection of texts that have not been censored, rewritten, or destroyed—none of that. The Gnostic Egyptian Nag Hammadi Library texts were hidden for over 1,900 years. In the "On the Origin of the World" text within the Nag Hammadi collection, there is a reference to the Phoenix and how it was designed to keep the archons in check—the Lords of time, the manipulators of our calendars. The Phoenix was described as a being that induces cyclical destructions.

Those who are destroying history didn't have access to the Nag Hammadi texts because they were hidden, so they didn't know. That's one text they couldn't destroy. If you read anything about the early Roman Church, you will find that for over 800 years, the Roman Church was on a campaign of genocide, destroying the students of the gnosis. They didn't stop until the 1200s A.D., when they finally exterminated the Waldenses and the Cathars—to a man, woman, and child—and destroyed all their texts and books. This was because the students of the gnosis asserted that Jesus was spirit and did not need to come in a physical body to save a bunch of spirits. God is Spirit, and everything He does is in spirit and in truth.

The whole crucifixion story was nothing but the Yaldabaoth, the dark ones' version of salvation; it was trickery. The words of Jesus are all that one needed to survive, for the spirit to mature, and for one to be born into the kingdom—to receive a new Avatar, rebirth, resurrection—call it whatever you want. However, the students of the gnosis did not believe in a physical Jesus who had been physically crucified. This was a resurrection of the old Bronze Age institution of human sacrifice because, in the Bronze Age, humans were sacrificed to ensure the sun didn't go dark.

This is why the church mixed a Phoenix episode in with the crucifixion in the Bible. The sun darkened, and there was a major earthquake when Jesus was crucified, but it's not true; they made that up. We have 10 different books written by 10 different historians living in those times in the First Century A.D., and not one of them mentioned the crucifixion, the Jesus narrative, the earthquake, or the eclipse—the sun darkening—none of them. We only find references to that in what scholars claim are Catholic forgeries by Dominican monks.

Just like the Donation of Constantine, the Roman Catholic Church forged a whole document claiming that Constantine donated the entire realm of the Mediterranean and Europe to the church. It's called the Donation of Constantine, but they messed up because centuries later, a genius reading the Donation of Constantine realized...

=> 02:14:00

The truth is often hidden beneath layers of deception, and history can be rewritten by those in power.

The narrative surrounding the crucifixion of Jesus is often challenged. It is asserted that "it's not true," and that "they made that up." There are 10 different books written by 10 different historians who lived during the First Century A.D., and notably, not one of them mentions the crucifixion, the earthquake, the eclipse, or the sun darkening. Instead, references to these events are found only in what scholars claim are Catholic forgeries by Dominican monks. This situation is likened to the Donation of Constantine, a document forged by the Roman Catholic Church that claimed Constantine donated the entire realm of the Mediterranean and Europe to the church. However, centuries later, a scholar discovered a significant inconsistency: the Donation of Constantine cited the Latin Vulgate, which had not been invented until 100 years after the document was supposedly created. This revelation underscores that the deception is real.

The discussion continues with the assertion that the Phoenix has been hid. The cipher, published in Tetrabiblos, is introduced as a means to educate the people of the time. Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos is associated with the Zodiac, which serves as a cipher for the four gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. However, there is nothing in the Tetrabiblos, the New Testament, or the Zodiac that references the Phoenix. This leads to a question about the Zodiac: why is it deemed impossible for the Zodiac to be over 4,300 years old? The answer lies in the vapor canopy; during this time, the sun was not visible, and the ancient sun calendars of the Americas could not have developed without the sun's appearance.

The ancient Egyptian Pantheon, known as The Aeneid, had a complete set of gods before a significant event known as the second intermediate period. During this time, the Egyptians introduced a new god, which puzzled Egyptologists. This new god, Horus, was introduced as the last god of the pantheon. The introduction of the sun as a god is significant because it coincided with the collapse of the vapor canopy.

Similarly, in the Sumerian civilization, records indicate that they documented their history both before and after the great flood. At the end of Sumerian civilization, they introduced a new god named Utu, sometimes referred to as Utushamash, who represented the sun in the sky. The timing of the sun's introduction as the last god in the Sumerian pantheon aligns with the collapse of the vapor canopy.

The ancient Mexican civilization also believed that the sun was born at the great flood, referring to it as the water sun. The collapse of the vapor canopy marked the beginning of sun-based counting systems, which is why a sun-based zodiac cannot be ancient. This conclusion leads to a direct challenge to Graham Hancock, suggesting that he should reconsider his statements regarding Göbekli Tepe and its age based on zodiac interpretations, labeling them as absolute crap.

Interestingly, Göbekli Tepe is just one of 22 or 23 temple sites. There are numerous other temple sites that have been buried, leading to the assertion that the theories surrounding them are flawed.

=> 02:18:42

The collapse of the vapor canopy marked the end of an ancient era, reshaping our sky and civilization's understanding of time.

Civilization has long held that the sun was born at the great flood, which is why they referred to it as the water sun. When the vapor canopy collapsed, it initiated the sun count systems. This is significant because it suggests that a sun-based zodiac cannot be old.

As we delve deeper, we find Gobekli Tepe is only one of 22 or 23 temple sites. There are numerous other temple sites, all of which were buried. The theory that these people buried their civilization before leaving is, quite frankly, stupid. Do you have any idea of the manpower that would be needed to gather the dirt to cover such structures? It’s just ridiculous. The collapse of the vapor canopy led to a mud flood that buried these sites.

Interestingly, Gobekli Tepe is located in Turkey. Upon conducting research, I discovered that there is no ancient Anatolian zodiac in that region. In the same area, the Hittite Empire existed, and they too had no zodiac. After their decline, a new civilization emerged, known as the Phrygians, who also did not have a zodiac. Following them, another culture related to the first emerged and became the Lydians, yet they recognized no zodiac either. Graham Hancock's assertion that a scorpion carved on a rock indicates Scorpio, thereby dating it to 8,000 BC, is simply absurd. One should lose IQ points listening to such drivel.

Someone asked me about the 23-degree angle tilt, referring to obliquity. While I am not finished with this presentation, I will address this important question. Currently, the sky simulation shows that we are tilted at a 23.5-degree obliquity, meaning the axis is inclined 23.5 degrees toward the ecliptic. I do not believe we live on a globe; rather, I believe we exist in a realm that is simulated, where the parameters of our existence are modified by our beliefs. Therefore, whether the world is flat or globular is a non-issue for me.

The sky simulation, which I find very real due to its optical nature, indicates that the arc is at 23.5 degrees. All traditions agree that at the great flood, the dragon fell, and when the dragon fell, the waters of the sky broke. This event marks the great flood and the collapse of the vapor canopy. The fall of the dragon refers to the ancient pole star, which is where we can engage in some compelling anthropological research. In my book, Lost Scriptures of Giza, I document that the universal ancient belief was that the pole star was the eye of the dragon, specifically Alpha Draconis.

The eye of the dragon never moved, while its tail moved around one-third of the circumpolar stars. Following the great flood, when the Phoenix appeared in 2239 BC in May, the entire sky shifted 23.5 degrees. This shift in the vapor canopy is why the axis now points toward the Great Bear, possibly Ursa Minor. The pole star Polaris, which we recognize today, is in the bear constellation, but it was not aligned there when the dragon reigned in the pre-flood world.

This historical narrative is reflected in the Chinese tradition, where their earliest rulers during the vapor canopy were referred to as the dragon kings. They received their authority from Heaven and were heavily bearded. When the dragon of the sky fell, the Mandate of Heaven changed, and the dragon kings lost their power. The story remains consistent across cultures and eras.

=> 02:23:19

The truth about astrology is that it's not the system that matters, but the individual behind it; true insight comes from spirit, not just stars.

The obliquity of the Earth, which is currently at 23.5 degrees, shifted when the vapor canopy collapsed. This shift is significant because it is why the axis now points at the Great Bear, possibly Ursa Minor. The pole star Polaris, which we have today, is located in the bear constellation, indicating where our axis is currently pointed. However, this was not the case when the dragon reigned in the pre-flood world.

Historically, the Chinese referred to their earliest rulers during the vapor canopy as the dragon Kings, who received their authority from Heaven. These rulers were described as heavily bearded. When the dragon of the sky fell, the Mandate of Heaven changed, resulting in the loss of power for the dragon Kings. This narrative is consistent across various cultures.

There were numerous attempts at creating a lunar zodiac sign, but none were successful, and we have almost zero data on these attempts. The Babylonians had the mule weapon, which consisted of 18 constellations they observed, but it was nothing like the zodiac we recognize today. The zodiac we know is a construct specifically designed by Ptolemy in his work Tetrabiblos.

It is important to note that our entire history is manufactured; the entire New Testament was also manufactured and is coded within symbols. The Tetrabiblos serves as a decoder, mirroring the four Gospels.

Astrologers, tarot card readers, diviners, and palmists often allow grifters to capitalize on these systems. However, it is crucial to understand that it’s never the system; it’s always the individual. Those who have their hearts in the right place can use any system effectively. This concept is discussed in my book, Awaken the Immortal Within.

As the Chinese proverb states, "when the right man makes use of the wrong means, the wrong means still work the right way." This highlights that it is all about Spirit. Some astrologers may mislead others, and their actions reveal whether they are guided by Spirit. Conversely, there are astrologers who accurately interpret patterns.

Astrology is fundamentally about pattern recognition. For thousands of years, people have observed that specific celestial alignments correspond with certain life events. However, this does not mean that all astrological predictions are true.

I do not have issues with individual astrologers, as I know some who are very accurate. However, I take issue with astrology being promoted as a genuine phenomenon. For example, on September 11, 2001, 2977 people died, and I do not recall a single astrologer predicting such a catastrophic event. This raises concerns, especially since many astrologers were active at that time.

Similarly, with the disappearance of Malaysian Flight 370, hundreds of people vanished without a trace, yet no astrologers predicted this event. According to the principles of astrology, the natal charts of those passengers should have indicated some form of impending doom.

In summary, while astrology can provide insights through pattern recognition, the individual’s interpretation and integrity are what ultimately determine its validity. When examining the natal charts of those who tragically died on 9/11, we must question what astrological predictions were made and why they failed to foresee such a significant event.

=> 02:27:47

Astrology claims to predict the future, yet it consistently fails to foresee major global tragedies and events. Where were the warnings when we needed them most?

The discussion begins with the observation that there were a lot of astrologers doing their thing back then, referring to a time when astrology was prevalent. However, the speaker questions the effectiveness of astrology by bringing up the case of Malaysian Flight 370, where hundreds of people vanished and have never been seen again. They ponder why no astrologers predicted this event, suggesting that according to the tenets of astrology, all those passengers in their astrological natal charts should have seen some type of Doom that day.

The speaker continues by referencing the tragic events of 9/11, where 2,977 fatalities died horrible deaths. They express skepticism about the astrological predictions related to those deaths, stating that if one were to analyze the natal charts of all the victims, we're going to see different planets in different houses and different moons in different places. The speaker critiques the subjectivity of astrology, noting that astrologers would explain the events based on each individual chart, which they find amorphous and highly subjective.

Furthermore, the speaker questions why astrologers did not predict significant changes that would occur by January 2020, including the loss of many lives and fundamental changes in personality and physique for decisions made in 2020 and 2021. They express disbelief that Facebook did not explode with astrologers warning about these impending changes, indicating a lack of credible predictions.

The speaker recalls two major tsunami events, one in Indonesia and another in Japan, which occurred after 9/11. They highlight that no astrologers predicted the tragic losses of life associated with these tsunamis, prompting curiosity about the reasons behind this oversight.

Moving on to political events, the speaker reflects on the U.S. presidential election, where Biden beat Trump. They mention that at the time, many believed Trump would remain in power, yet he walked away, leading to a global shock when Biden won. The speaker emphasizes that not one astrologer had predicted that, and they challenge anyone to correct them if they know of any major astrologers who made such predictions.

The conversation shifts to recent tragic events in Maui, Hawaii, questioning whether any astrologers had made projections about these occurrences. The speaker expresses doubt, stating, I don't believe we do, and invites corrections if they are wrong.

The speaker identifies as a critic by nature, expressing a logical approach to astrology. They convey skepticism towards many astrologers, suggesting that a lot of these people just make up stuff on the fly. They reference Helena Blavatsky and her works, Isis Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine, noting that they have read both and possess an old copy of the latter. The speaker critiques Blavatsky for making similar mistakes as Graham Hancock, citing her references to the 25,000-year cycle and the dating of Atlantis to 12,000 BC. They conclude that this reliance on specific narratives is why they can't take her seriously.

=> 02:32:08

Don't let flawed narratives shape your understanding of history; seek the truth behind the stories.

I am, by nature, very logical. I just cannot get into the channeling aspect of certain beliefs. I truly believe that many of these individuals simply make up stuff on the fly. I am very, very confident that a lot of them do fabricate their claims, such as Helena Blavatsky. Many people admire her works like Isis Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine, but I have read both of them. In fact, I have a very old copy of The Secret Doctrine by Blavatsky, which I was just showing Dawn last night.

Blavatsky made the same mistakes that Graham Hancock made. She cites a lot of the Golden Dawn material and references the 25,000-year cycle, claiming that Atlantis existed around 12,000 BC. She follows a specific cipher and calendar narrative, which is why I cannot take her seriously. Furthermore, she states that most of her material comes from a very obscure book that has never been seen by anyone else in the world, known as the Book of Dyson. I simply cannot buy into that.

It doesn't even matter, though, because chronology is my specialty. When I encounter a writer attempting to promote a version of history that can easily be disproven, it frustrates me. The mistakes made by these authors have already been corrected by ancient writers that Graham Hancock should have known about. Helena Blavatsky should have read Eudoxus, but I have to believe they either didn't or are lying, as these mistakes were already addressed. They already knew it was 9,000 moons, not 9,000 years. I don't believe that people are making these types of mistakes; rather, I see these as agendas being played out.

If astrology doesn't really have any utility, then it is merely entertainment. I'm not denying that there are deep spiritual teachings to be found in astrology, nor am I saying that astral theology is wrong. In fact, I am saying just the opposite. I believe that astrology, as a predictive system, is only accurate because of pattern recognition, not because of the system itself. This is a Cracker Jack decoder for the New Testament.

My main issue with this presentation is similar to Graham Hancock's dating of Göbekli Tepe. You cannot date a structure that has been underground and excavated, especially one that has a scorpion effigy on it. You cannot label that as a zodiac when the zodiac didn't even exist when that structure was buried. This is a fundamental argument that I have presented. I have shown that the zodiac was unknown worldwide until the Zodiac of Dendera was established by the Greeks under the Romans in Egypt around 75 BC. Another zodiac appeared later, which is different from the one at Dendera, and this is the one we reference today, invented by Ptolemy in Tetrabiblos.

This is how Graham Hancock attempts to connect ancient ruins that were buried underground. He has nothing else to support his claims; he simply points to a scorpion and asserts that it represents Scorpio. It is absolutely crazy. We cannot overlook this fundamental fact: throughout the entirety of Greek mythology, there are no references or stories about the zodiac, nor are there any appearances of the Phoenix.

In this presentation, I have shown you the facts. You can interpret them however you wish, but I am stating now that the zodiac is literally 18 centuries old. It was designed at the same time as the New Testament, which contains hundreds of stories, allegories, metaphors, symbols, imagery, and language that are all intertwined with this Cracker Jack decoder. The Tetramorph and the four royal stars also make their appearances within this context. Listen, it is all by design, but this entire system completely omits the Phoenix.

=> 02:36:40

The truth is often buried beneath layers of deception, but those who dare to dig deeper will uncover the real story.

Phoenix

All throughout this presentation, I have shown you the facts. You interpreted me where you wanted to. I'm telling you now, the zodiac is literally 18 centuries old. It was written and designed at the exact same time as the New Testament, which has hundreds of stories, allegories, metaphors, symbols, imagery, and language that are all wrapped around this Cracker Jack decoder right here—the tetramorph. The tetramorph even makes its appearance, as do the four royal stars. Listen, guys, it's all by design. However, this entire system totally omits the Phoenix.

Moreover, this Ptolemaic zodiac in New Testament books never mentions a 25,920-year cycle, which was known to Helena Blavatsky and promoted by Graham Hancock and other authors who put together all these sensational books. Look, I'm telling you, this is deeper than you think. When all these same authors jumped on the 2012 bandwagon, Graham Hancock was one of the only survivors from that genre of writers. Most of them just fell off into obscurity, while Graham Hancock trudged on.

Now, we have all these new writers coming out with theories about Göbekli Tepe and the Anunnaki. They are all wrong, guys. Remember, in all my presentations, I've been as honest as possible. I show you my sources and all my citations. I'm telling you now, I don't know of any other person in the world who has done the research I have in chronology. It is only a chronologist who could put all this together because I have to study calendars and timekeeping systems to understand and decode what people's belief systems were. In doing all that, I'm able to easily unravel all this drivel that's being published today. Every bit of it is false and ridiculous.

This is why no one has met my challenges. This is why no one wants to debate me on these issues. It's not that they're intimidated by intelligence; I don't believe that. It's not that they don't have good books; I don't believe that at all. It's that they know their own theories and research will never stand up to scrutiny. We are not only being deceived; we are being deceived in a very organized fashion.

What I have revealed in this video goes straight to the heart of many things that are in the community right now. That's why so many people and chat channels have attacked Archaics. Many of you don't even know that people who used to be prominent on my channel have totally turned on me. Yes, people who started channels linked to the Archaics community, who used my material, have now positioned themselves as enemies, writing nasty comments about me and making derogatory remarks in their videos. I'm not worried about any of it. I've already told you guys I'm moving forward; the resistance is real. There are a lot of channels out there that hate my guts.

The tarot readers, the Galactic Federations—this data completely collapses the whole Ancient Aliens narrative, every bit of it. Yes, the Galactic Federation narrative, the whole channeling narratives, and all the people who believe that the tarot cards are ancient—it's all BS. I've already cited all those ancient authors, civilizations, ancient epics, and massively old texts. I've cited them right here. You guys are going to get the free PDF; you can download it and see everything I've talked about in this video laid out intelligently. Please send Graham Hancock a copy.

That's my presentation, guys. I don't want to ramble any longer, but this data—not just this, but many videos I've done in the past 30 days—collapse all these narratives promoted across YouTube, particularly the Ancient Aliens narrative. I might focus on it here in the near future just so everybody's on the same page about how comical and ridiculous it is.

Yes, guys, I have never said I don't believe in UFOs. I have never said that I don't believe that another race occupies this world. But they're not Ancient Aliens. There have been people in the Underworld since day one, and their technologies and infrastructure are how we on the surface keep getting blessed with all these new technologies. This has been a game that's been played out over and over again.

We already have new authors popping up now—not just the one I dissected who was trying to change the Phoenix narrative. I just discovered another guy who did the same thing; he wrote two books in 2023. I'm about to dissect his books too—another person trying to change the whole narrative on the Phoenix and all that stuff. So, we have a concerted effort; somebody with deep pockets is now paying people to attack Archaics.

You know what? I'm telling you guys now, I'm up for the challenge. From day one, when I started my mission, I have always been able to draw from myself more than I contain. I understand that what I'm doing is empowered by spirit. I just have an eighth-grade education; I'm just a good old boy. But what comes out of me comes from somewhere else. All these people who have aligned themselves against me are going to fall because I'm far from done, my friends.

That totally ends my presentation today. I love you guys.